Advertisement

Translation, transcultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire in German

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To translate the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) from French to German, to undertake transcultural adaptation, and to test reliability and validity.

      Design

      German translation according to sequential forward and backward translation approach, and transcultural adaptation by a consensus process. Validity testing was assessed in a cross-sectional study.

      Setting

      Outpatient physiotherapy department of a multidisciplinary clinic.

      Participants

      One hundred and twenty-three outpatients with musculoskeletal health disorders after completion of outpatient physiotherapy.

      Main outcome measures

      Test–retest reliability was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1), and Chronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency of the questionnaire. A factor analysis was performed to investigate the factor structure of the questionnaire. No comparable gold-standard measurement of patient satisfaction was retrieved. The construct validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the most indicative item and the global scale excluding this item.

      Results

      Translation and transcultural adaptation according to international guidelines did not produce any content or language problems. For 23 test–retest questionnaires, the ICC ranged from 0.74 (Item 10) to 0.92 (Item 11), corresponding to a Chronbach's alpha ranging from 0.85 to 0.96. On Item 12, correlations of 0.53–0.83 were obtained for the subscores and 0.79 for the total score. High values were obtained for content validity and face validity.

      Conclusions

      The PSQ in German proved to be good in terms of practical application, comprehensibility, internal consistency, reliability and validity. It is suitable for use to record patient satisfaction after outpatient physiotherapy in German-speaking areas.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Physiotherapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Loubeau P.R.
        • Jantzen R.
        Marketing research activities in hospitals. Satisfaction surveys of inpatients and outpatients are the most widely used application.
        Market Health Serv. 1998; 18: 12-17
        • Angst F.
        • Pap G.
        • Mannion A.F.
        • Herren D.B.
        • Aeschlimann A.
        • Schwyzer H.K.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51: 819-828
        • Chiu T.T.
        • Lam T.H.
        • Hedley A.J.
        Correlation among physical impairments, pain, disability, and patient satisfaction in patients with chronic neck pain.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 534-540
        • Keus S.H.
        • Bloem B.R.
        • Verbaan D.
        • de Jonge P.A.
        • Hofman M.
        • van Hilten B.J.
        • et al.
        Physiotherapy in Parkinson's disease: utilisation and patient satisfaction.
        J Neurol. 2004; 251: 680-687
        • Munneke M.
        • de Jong Z.
        • Zwinderman A.H.
        • Jansen A.
        • Ronday H.K.
        • Peter W.F.
        • et al.
        Adherence and satisfaction of rheumatoid arthritis patients with a long-term intensive dynamic exercise program (RAPIT program).
        Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 49: 665-672
        • Donabedian A.
        Methods for deriving criteria for assessing the quality of medical care.
        Med Care Rev. 1980; 37: 653-698
        • Donabedian A.
        The quality of care. How can it be assessed?.
        JAMA. 1988; 260: 1743-1748
        • Cleary P.D.
        • McNeil B.J.
        Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.
        Inquiry. 1988; 25: 25-36
        • Pascoe G.C.
        Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis.
        Eval Prog Plan. 1983; 6: 185-210
        • Rahmqvist M.
        Patient satisfaction in relation to age, health status and other background factors: a model for comparisons of care units.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2001; 13: 385-390
        • Beattie P.F.
        • Pinto M.B.
        • Nelson M.K.
        • Nelson R.
        Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: instrument validation.
        Phys Ther. 2002; 82: 557-565
        • Goldstein M.S.
        • Elliott S.D.
        • Guccione A.A.
        The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy.
        Phys Ther. 2000; 80: 853-863
        • Monnin D.
        • Perneger T.V.
        Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy.
        Phys Ther. 2002; 82: 682-691
        • Oermann C.M.
        • Swank P.R.
        • Sockrider M.M.
        Validation of an instrument measuring patient satisfaction with chest physiotherapy techniques in cystic fibrosis.
        Chest. 2000; 118: 92-97
        • Roush S.E.
        • Sonstroem R.J.
        Development of the physical therapy outpatient satisfaction survey (PTOPS).
        Phys Ther. 1999; 79: 159-170
        • Sadeq M.M.
        • Adib S.M.
        Satisfaction with physiotherapy among patients at a general hospital in Kuwait.
        Saudi Med J. 2002; 23: 981-985
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Feeny D.H.
        • Patrick D.L.
        Measuring health-related quality of life.
        Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118: 622-629
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Bombardier C.
        • Guillemin F.
        • Ferraz M.B.
        Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 3186-3191
        • Hudak P.L.
        • Wright J.G.
        The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 3167-3177
        • Ware J.
        • Kosinski M.
        • Gandek B.
        SF-36 Health survey: manual and interpretation guide.
        3rd ed. QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI2004
        • Offenbaecher M.
        • Ewert T.
        • Sangha O.
        • Stucki G.
        Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G).
        J Rheumatol. 2002; 29: 401-402
        • Portney L.
        Statistical measure of reliability.
        Foundations of clinical research: application to practice. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall Health, New Jersey2000
        • Mazor K.M.
        • Clauser B.E.
        • Field T.
        • Yood R.A.
        • Gurwitz J.H.
        A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.
        Health Serv Res. 2002; 37: 1403-1417
        • Mannion A.F.
        • Junge A.
        • Fairbank J.C.
        • Dvorak J.
        • Grob D.
        Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.
        Eur Spine J. 2006; 15: 55-65
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Cronbach's alpha.
        BMJ. 1997; 314: 572
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
        • Guillemin F.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures.
        Scand J Rheumatol. 1995; 24: 61-63
        • Andresen E.M.
        Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: S15-S20
        • Kirshner B.
        • Guyatt G.
        A methodological framework for assessing health indices.
        J Chronic Dis. 1985; 38: 27-36
        • Engelberg R.
        • Martin D.P.
        • Agel J.
        • Obremsky W.
        • Coronado G.
        • Swiontkowski M.F.
        Musculoskeletal function assessment instrument: criterion and construct validity.
        J Orthop Res. 1996; 14: 182-192
        • Swiontkowski M.F.
        • Engelberg R.
        • Martin D.P.
        • Agel J.
        Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1999; 81: 1245-1260
        • Streiner D.
        • Norman G.
        Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use.
        3rd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford2003
        • Keith R.A.
        Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 1122-1128
        • Williams B.
        • Coyle J.
        • Healy D.
        The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels.
        Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47: 1351-1359
        • Verra M.L.
        • Angst F.
        • Lehmann S.
        • Aeschlimann A.
        Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-D).
        J Pain. 2006; 7: 327-336
        • Angst F.
        • Goldhahn J.
        • Pap G.
        • Mannion A.F.
        • Roach K.E.
        • Siebertz D.
        • et al.
        Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).
        Rheumatology. 2007; 46: 87-92
        • Lasek R.J.
        • Barkley W.
        • Harper D.L.
        • Rosenthal G.E.
        An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys.
        Med Care. 1997; 35: 646-652
        • Perneger T.V.
        • Chamot E.
        • Bovier P.A.
        Nonresponse bias in a survey of patient perceptions of hospital care.
        Med Care. 2005; 43: 374-380
        • Spooner S.H.
        Survey response rates and overall patient satisfaction scores: what do they mean?.
        J Nurs Care Qual. 2003; 18: 162-174