<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Physiotherapy - Articles in Press</title><description>Physiotherapy RSS feed: Articles in Press. 
 Physiotherapy   aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and 
other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work 
concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services 
and policy. 
We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, critical reviews (meta-analysis, systematic 
or narrative reviews), educational, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports, statistical compilations, case histories or single 
case studies. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.  
 
 Peer Review Policy 
 
 
 Physiotherapy  
 is peer reviewed by an international panel and operates a system of blind, anonymous refereeing. At least two independent opinions are 
sought on all papers. Referees are asked to discuss any conflict of interest with the editor before undertaking the review. Referees 
and associate editors, who receive the manuscript sequentially, are each asked to provide their review within three weeks of receiving 
the manuscript. Associate editors are aware of authorship.

 
 
 Publication Ethics  
 
 Physiotherapy   is a signatory 
journal to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) code of conduct for editors. This code will guide the editorial board and reviewers 
in their approach to any ethical issues arising in respect of papers submitted to  Physiotherapy .</description><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0031-9406</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2010-02-22</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000210/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000222/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001369/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001370/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001394/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000167/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001266/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001308/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001278/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900128X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001291/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001321/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001205/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001382/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001254/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900131X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001357/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001345/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900100X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001102/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000935/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001217/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900087X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000224/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000030/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000042/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000210/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Comparison of the 6-minute walk distance test performed on a non-motorised treadmill and in a corridor in healthy elderly subjects - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000210/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: To compare the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test performed on a non-motorised treadmill (6MWD-T) with the 6MWD test performed in a corridor (6MWD-C) in healthy elderly subjects.Participants: Sixteen healthy elderly individuals.Design: Participants performed three 6MWD-T tests and three 6MWD-C tests on two different days.Outcome measures: Distance walked was recorded in metres. Perceived exertion and leg fatigue were rated on the modified Borg scale before and after each test.Results: Using the Bland and Altman limits of agreement analysis method, the mean difference between the two methods was 153.3m (limits of agreement: 28 to 278). The mean difference between days 1 and 2 for the 6MWD-C test was −7.2m (limits of agreement: −45.4 to 30.8), and the mean difference between days 1 and 2 for the 6MWD-T test was −1.6m (limits of agreement: −64.0 to 60.7). The mean difference between the first and second repetitions of the 6MWD-C test was −5m (limits of agreement: −41 to 31), and the mean difference between the first and second repetitions of the 6MWD-T test was −17m (limits of agreement: −85 to 51).Conclusions: The 6MWD-C and 6MWD-T tests are not interchangeable. However, the results showed good test–retest reliability between days and between test repetitions for both tests. Therefore, the 6MWD-T test may offer an alternative option to the 6MWD-C test when a 30-m corridor is not available. These findings may have implications for execution of the 6MWT-T test within cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation.</description><dc:title>Comparison of the 6-minute walk distance test performed on a non-motorised treadmill and in a corridor in healthy elderly subjects - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Tania Janaudis-Ferreira, Gunnevi Sundelin, Karin Wadell</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.015</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-02-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-02-22</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000222/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000222/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The authors of this book seek to help patients with lupus and their families and carers to understand the origins of the disease, the range of problems it can cause and the best ways in which to manage those problems.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Anna Mayhew</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.12.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-02-15</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-02-15</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001369/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001369/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This book has been written as a practical resource for those working with more complex and high-risk patients within cardiac rehabilitation. It is a follow-up text to ‘Exercise Leadership in Cardiac Rehabilitation’ , written by a team of authors with clinical expertise in this area. Whilst the authors have acknowledged that it would be useful to use these two books in conjunction for information about the organisation and delivery of exercise to this more complex group of patients, this book does stand alone in meeting its aims. The text places more emphasis on the pathophysiology, medications and other aspects of management for these patient groups with well-organised chapters on type II diabetes, chronic heart failure, arrhythmia and implanted cardioverter defibrillators, heart transplant and comorbidity, and ageing. The current evidence base for exercise in these patients is included with suggestions and practical advice for their management, based on the clinical expertise of the contributing authors. The book is well structured and can be used to find important information quickly.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Helen Fiddler</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-02-08</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-02-08</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001370/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Are physiotherapy students adequately prepared to successfully gain employment? - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001370/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To explore the preparedness of final-year physiotherapy students for their progression into employment, and identify what universities can do to facilitate a smooth transition.Design: A single-cohort study, utilising a qualitative design incorporating a survey followed by transcribed and coded semi-structured interviews.Setting: Interviews were held in the Placement and Careers Centre at Brunel University, London.Participants: Sixty final-year full- and part-time students participated in the survey, and 12 final-year full- and part-time students participated in the semi-structured interviews.Methods: Sixty students completed a questionnaire which explored their preparedness for employment. Questions related to the current job situation, the application process and the student's ideal first post. Responses from the questionnaire were analysed and discussed further through a digitally recorded interview. Twelve students were interviewed by an experienced interviewer from a non-physiotherapy background.Results: Students felt unprepared for employment. Forty-seven per cent wanted a rotational post, but 26% would only spend 6 months and 39% would only spend 1 year looking for a job. Seventy-one percent would change career and 99% would work abroad if they were unable to secure a post in the UK. Most importantly, students could not identify transferable skills required by potential employers; only 25% cited effective communications, and 10% cited flexible working as a transferable skill. Self-management skills (e.g. prioritisation, time management and documentation) were not perceived as essential for employment.Conclusions: The job market requires physiotherapy graduates to possess transferable skills which can be applied to any situation. Many are integral to the profession and the undergraduate curriculum; however, analysis and assimilation of these skills cannot be assumed. Universities should reflect on their curriculum delivery to produce graduates who meet employers’ expectations and make a smooth transition into the workplace.</description><dc:title>Are physiotherapy students adequately prepared to successfully gain employment? - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Mandy Jones, Judith McIntyre, Sandra Naylor</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001394/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Long-term reliability of the incremental shuttle walking test in clinically stable cardiovascular disease patients - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001394/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) is a valuable tool for assessing changes in patients’ functional capacity during cardiac rehabilitation. However, studies have only assessed its test–retest reliability in the short term. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term test–retest reliability of the ISWT in clinically stable cardiac patients.Design: Test–retest reliability assessment.Setting: Continuous, community-based phase IV cardiac rehabilitation centre.Participants: Thirty patients with cardiovascular disease (15 males, 15 females; age 55 to 80 years) volunteered to participate in the study.Interventions: Participants undertook two ISWTs, a minimum of 8 weeks apart.Main outcome measures: ISWT performance in metres.Results: Overall, the mean distance walked in the pre-test was 502±161m and this did not differ from test to retest. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80, indicating good test–retest reliability. Using the Bland and Altman method, there was a small mean test–retest difference (−7m). The 95% limits of agreement were large, ranging from −203m to 189m.Conclusions: Over long test–retest durations, there appears to be no learning effect in the ISWT, negating the need for a practice walk. The long-term random variation in the ISWT test is larger than in previous studies, probably due to greater physiological and psychological variation in the participants over 8 weeks compared with that seen in day-to-day testing. Factors influencing long-term test–retest reliability of the ISWT require further elucidation.</description><dc:title>Long-term reliability of the incremental shuttle walking test in clinically stable cardiovascular disease patients - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Garyfallia Pepera, Joanne McAllister, Gavin Sandercock</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000167/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Influence of self-reported socio-economic status on lung function of adult Nigerians - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940610000167/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: Low socio-economic status is known to be associated with reduced lung function in childhood and early adulthood, and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in older adults. The lung function of people in developing nations is known to be lower than that of their counterparts in developed nations. This study assessed whether childhood socio-economic status is related to lung function in adults in Nigeria.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: Ife central local government, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.Participants: One thousand nine hundred and thirty healthy adults aged 40 to 80 years took part in the study. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1second (FEV1) were measured with a spirometer, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured with a mechanical peak expiratory flow meter. The socio-economic status questionnaire gave equal importance to education, occupation and family income. Based on the score, the subjects were classified as lower, middle or higher status.Main outcome measures: Spirometry, assessment of peak flow meter and questionnaire to assess socio-economic status.Results: The results showed a difference between the group with the highest socio-economic status and the other two groups [mean (standard deviation) FVC: high 3.63l (0.33), middle 3.57l (0.41), low 3.38l (0.35)]. The mean difference between the high and middle socio-economic groups was 0.07l [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.11]. A similar difference existed for FEV1: high 3.16l (0.28), middle 3.06l (0.31), low 2.94l (0.34). The mean difference between the high and middle socio-economic groups was 0.11l (95% CI 0.07 to 0.15). Values for PEF were: high 404.30l/second (35.98), medium 390.56l/second (41.53), low 376.03l/second (45.81). The mean difference between the high and medium socio-economic groups was 13.74l/second (95% CI 8.42 to 19.06). There was a weak but significant association between socio-economic status and FVC (r=0.28), FEV1 (r=0.26) and PEF (r=0.25).Conclusion: Self-reported low socio-economic status is associated with lower lung function among adult Nigerians. This may increase their risk for respiratory and cardiovascular disease.</description><dc:title>Influence of self-reported socio-economic status on lung function of adult Nigerians - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Rufus A. Adedoyin, Gregory E. Erhabor, Akanmu Olajide, Olugbolahan J. Anifowose</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-27</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001266/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The effect of a group education programme on pain and function through knowledge acquisition and home-based exercise among patients with knee osteoarthritis - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001266/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To assess the effect of a group education programme on pain and function through knowledge acquisition and a home-based exercise programme.Design: A parallel randomised single-blind clinical trial.Participants: Fifty patients aged 65 years or over with knee osteoarthritis.Interventions: The study group (n=25) was given a group education programme once a week for 4 weeks, followed by a self-executed home-based exercise programme. The controls (n=25) were given a brief course in short-wave diathermy treatment.Main outcome measures: Patients were assessed before the intervention, after the intervention (4 weeks) and again 8 weeks later (follow-up) using the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the repeated sit-to-stand test and the get-up-and-go test.Results: At 4 weeks, there was a significant improvement in both groups in all outcome variables except the WOMAC stiffness score; for example, the WOMAC total score was reduced by a mean of 9.5 points [95% confidence interval (CI) −12.3 to −6.7]. However, at follow-up, patients in the study group demonstrated continued improvement in the get-up-and-go test and the WOMAC total, pain and disability scores, but no such improvement was noted among the controls. This difference was significant; for example, the difference in mean WOMAC total score between the groups was −9.0 points (95%CI −14.5 to −3.4).Conclusion: A simple group education programme for patients with knee osteoarthritis is associated with improved functional abilities and pain reduction. Further study is required to determine if this positive effect can be maintained over a longer period.</description><dc:title>The effect of a group education programme on pain and function through knowledge acquisition and home-based exercise among patients with knee osteoarthritis - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Tomer Bezalel, Eli Carmeli, Michal Katz-Leurer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-22</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001308/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Cognitive determinants of pain and disability in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001308/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: To delineate the relative extent to which specific cognitive factors are related to levels of pain and disability in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder.Design: Cross-sectional observation study.Setting: Three secondary care physiotherapy departments in the Greater Manchester region of the UK.Participants: All patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder referred to the participating departments were invited to take part in the study. In total, 124 patients were invited to participate, and 63 (51%) agreed to do so. Complete data were available for 55 (44%) of those invited to participate in the study.Main outcome measures: Pain and disability, as assessed by the Neck Disability Index.Results: Cognitive factors were strongly related to levels of disability (R2 change=0.39, P&lt;0.001). Specifically, greater catastrophising (β=0.41, P&lt;0.01) and lower functional self-efficacy beliefs (β=−0.47, P&lt;0.001) were significantly related to greater levels of disability. Significant univariate correlations were seen between the cognitive factors and current pain intensity. However, no significant associations were seen between the cognitive factors and current pain intensity in the multivariate analysis.Conclusions: Interventions which aim to reduce catastrophising and enhance functional self-efficacy beliefs should be included alongside conventional physiotherapy interventions when treating patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder.</description><dc:title>Cognitive determinants of pain and disability in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Dave P. Thompson, Jacqueline A. Oldham, Martin Urmston, Steve R. Woby</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-22</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-22</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001278/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The effect of a physiotherapy education compared with a non-healthcare education on the attitudes and beliefs of students towards functioning in individuals with back pain - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001278/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the difference in attitudes: (1) between first and fourth year physiotherapy students towards functioning in individuals with back pain; and (2) between physiotherapy students and non-healthcare students towards functioning in individuals with back pain.Design: Observational, cross-sectional study.Setting: Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.Participants: First year physiotherapy (n=61) and non-healthcare students (n=61), and fourth year physiotherapy (n=62) and non-healthcare students (n=62).Main outcomes: All participants completed the Health Care Providers’ Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (range 15 to 105). This questionnaire measures attitudes towards functioning in individuals with back pain.Results: Fourth year physiotherapy students had more positive attitudes towards functioning in individuals with back pain than first year physiotherapy students [57.4 vs 66.6 (mean difference −9.2, 95% confidence interval −12.2 to −6.1, P&lt;0.01)]. Similarly, fourth year non-healthcare students had more positive attitudes towards functioning in individuals with back pain compared with first year non-healthcare students [69.2 vs 65.3 (mean difference −3.9, 95% confidence interval −7.2 to −0.5, P=0.03)]. Physiotherapy students had more positive attitudes than non-healthcare students in the first year [66.6 vs 69.2 (mean difference −2.6, 95% confidence interval −5.5 to 0.4, P=0.08)] and the fourth year [57.4 vs 65.3 (mean difference −7.9, 95% confidence interval −11.4 to −4.4, P&lt;0.01)] of study.Conclusion: These findings suggest that physiotherapy education brings about positive student attitudes towards functioning in individuals with back pain. This may be partly attributable to receiving a university degree education, but would appear to be further enhanced by specifically receiving a physiotherapy degree. This may facilitate students to become more evidence-based practitioners following qualification.</description><dc:title>The effect of a physiotherapy education compared with a non-healthcare education on the attitudes and beliefs of students towards functioning in individuals with back pain - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Cormac Ryan, Dervla Murphy, Michael Clark, Andrew Lee</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-20</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900128X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900128X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The aim of this book is to bring together the law and practice in community care. It attempts to explain the legal powers and duties of local authorities and the UK National Health Service (NHS), and raise awareness of people's legal rights in community care practice. It covers social care, health and various housing services for vulnerable people, such as older people, younger adults with disabilities or mental health needs, and people with drug and alcohol problems, and also covers issues around informal care. It is aimed at service users, managers and front-line health and social care workers.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Raija Kuisma</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.10.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001291/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001291/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This book is aimed at empowering people with low back pain to manage their pain appropriately. It contains sections on understanding back pain, medical treatments, self treatments and case histories. It encourages self management by different strategies including exercise, relaxation and goal-setting. A section is also included on different types of investigations and treatments available, including medication, injections, surgery, physiotherapy and counselling. Emphasis is placed on the impact of chronic pain on mood and lifestyle, and advice is given on coping strategies, self treatments, pacing and recognition of unhelpful beliefs. Flare-up plans are discussed in terms of managing a higher level of pain, and maintaining movement and activity rather than the pain stopping the sufferer in their tracks.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Lynne Gaskell</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.10.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001321/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001321/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The latest book in the ‘Physiotherapy Toolbox’ series aims to provide an essential guide for students and newly qualified clinicians to measurement methods used in practice.   The book provides a practical guide to measurement methods such as goniometry, manual muscle testing and spirometry. While the authors state that they do not intend to review the literature critically, they touch on the reliability and validity of the measurement tools in an introductory chapter, and provide summary tables of relevant studies in the appendix.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jane Hislop</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-20</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-20</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001205/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The impact of home-based physiotherapy interventions on breathlessness during activities of daily living in severe COPD: A systematic review - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001205/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of home-based physiotherapy interventions on breathlessness during activities of daily living (ADL) in severe chronic obstructive disease (COPD).Data sources: The electronic databases AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched from their inception to Week 20 2008. Bibliographies of all potentially relevant retrieved studies, identified relevant systematic reviews and international guidelines were searched by hand.Review methods: Inclusion criteria consisted of individuals over 18 years of age with severe COPD (defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤50% predicted) without cardiovascular co-morbidities, home-based interventions and valid, reliable breathlessness ADL outcome measures. The PEDro scale assessed methodological quality. Data extraction included baseline characteristics, treatment intervention, frequency of training, level of supervision, breathlessness ADL outcome measure and results. Where possible, a random-effects meta-analysis was applied to appropriate trial data to produce overall quantitative results.Results: Seven studies, providing nine data sets, met the inclusion criteria. Trial PEDro scores ranged from 4 to 7 out of 10. Studies were homogenous at baseline regarding age and COPD severity, although subjects were predominantly male. Five studies investigated inspiratory or expiratory muscle training, and two studies investigated exercises. Statistically significant breathlessness ADL outcome improvements were reported for all interventions except expiratory muscle training. Five studies demonstrated clinical significance (four for inspiratory muscle training and one for exercise). However, due to heterogeneity among study interventions and outcomes, meta-analysis was only considered clinically appropriate on one occasion to pool three inspiratory muscle training studies in relation to breathlessness score. The random-effects meta-analysis indicated that, on average, inspiratory muscle training improved the breathlessness score significantly by 2.36 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 3.96) compared with controls.Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle training and exercise are home-based physiotherapy interventions that may improve breathlessness during ADL in severe COPD. Administration can only be advocated tentatively in outpatient services and primary care at this stage because further higher quality, more homogeneous research with larger sample sizes is required to substantiate the current findings.</description><dc:title>The impact of home-based physiotherapy interventions on breathlessness during activities of daily living in severe COPD: A systematic review - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Martin J. Thomas, Janet Simpson, Richard Riley, Emily Grant</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>SYSTEMATIC REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001382/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Experiences of new physiotherapy lecturers making the shift from clinical practice into academia - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001382/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To explore the experiences of physiotherapists making the transition from practising physiotherapist to physiotherapy lecturer in higher education, and to understand these experiences in order to inform an explanation of ways of managing this transition.Design: A qualitative, interpretive research design using semi-structured interviews. The interviews were transcribed, read and thematically analysed.Participants: Using purposive sampling, eight physiotherapy lecturers within their first 4 years of teaching in higher education at one North West university were interviewed.Findings: Despite having previous successful clinical careers, participants initially struggled to make the transition, characterised by initial feelings of uncertainty and inadequacy. Participants took between 1.5 and 3 years to socialise into their new academic role, adopting a new professional identity as a physiotherapy academic. Informal learning and peer support were the most valued mechanisms of support, more so than a formally structured mentoring process. Challenges of dual professionalism and tensions emerged regarding the expected academic roles of a lecturer. Confidence in developing a pedagogy for higher education and contributing to established communities of practice were key indicators of successfully making the shift to becoming an academic.Conclusions: To meet the new physiotherapy lecturers’ needs and build up confidence in higher education, more effective induction strategies are worthy of endeavour. More formal training designed to specifically address those aspects of transition particular to clinicians making the shift from clinical practice into academia is suggested.</description><dc:title>Experiences of new physiotherapy lecturers making the shift from clinical practice into academia - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Kay M. Hurst</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-18</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001254/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A cognitive-behavioural programme for the management of low back pain in primary care: A description and justification of the intervention used in the Back Skills Training Trial (BeST; ISRCTN 54717854) - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001254/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>A cognitive-behavioural programme for the management of low back pain in primary care: A description and justification of the intervention used in the Back Skills Training Trial (BeST; ISRCTN 54717854) - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-15</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-15</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900131X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900131X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This book forms part of the ‘Hands on Guide for Therapists’ and is also available as an e-book. The handbook introduces therapists to the practical application of soft tissue release techniques. The book is aimed at therapists with a broad knowledge base and, importantly, carries a strong, unambiguous safety message in the application of techniques.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Anne Binks</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-15</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-15</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001357/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Lost in translation? How patients perceive the extended scope of physiotherapy in the emergency department - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001357/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the perceptions of emergency department physiotherapy practice by emergency patients in metropolitan and regional Australia with a view to probing how consumers interpret the place of physiotherapy in such an acute, non-traditional setting.Design: A qualitative investigation using a descriptive open-ended questionnaire technique was administered to emergency patients in order to thematically analyse their perceptions of emergency physiotherapy practice.Setting: Case 1 was a metropolitan emergency department in Melbourne, Australia. Case 2 was a regional emergency department in North Queensland, Australia.Participants: A purposeful, convenience sample of 80 emergency department patients (n=40, Case 1; n=40, Case 2) responded to the open-ended questionnaire.Analysis: Data were thematically analysed using NVivo software and manual analysis, facilitating constant case comparison, and were reflected upon continually within an interpretivist framework.Results: Participants at both emergency departments had a general, but limited, awareness of the role of physiotherapy. Among multiple themes identified were six key domains which participants could recognise as being both the role of general physiotherapy and also relevant to the emergency setting. These were sports injury management, musculoskeletal care, rehabilitation and mobility, pain management, respiratory care and management of elderly patients. Discussions also involved those areas that were specific to general physiotherapy practice or emergency department care but which did not overlap.Conclusions: Participants in this study demonstrated a general, but limited, awareness of the scope of physiotherapy practice. There was strong identification of musculoskeletal-based interventions, with less familiarity with the potential role of physiotherapy in cardiorespiratory and rehabilitative management. Further research is needed on consumer awareness of the broader, less traditional roles of physiotherapy to increase acceptance and familiarity of its extended scope.</description><dc:title>Lost in translation? How patients perceive the extended scope of physiotherapy in the emergency department - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Sophie Anaf, Lorraine A. Sheppard</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-11</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-11</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001345/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001345/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The authors of this book aim to deliver a comprehensive yet easy-to-read reference guide which is accessible to both students and practitioners.   Within a broad context which includes health and social care, the authors use examples and experience from the healthcare setting, with occasional examples from social care. The content is not new or groundbreaking, more a well-referenced overview that delivers sound theory to underpin execution of evidence-based practice with relevance to physiotherapy.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Laura Partridge</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-08</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-08</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900100X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900100X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: Postero-anterior (PA) mobilisation is commonly used in cervical spine treatment and included in physiotherapy curricula. The manual forces that students apply while learning cervical mobilisation are not known. Quantifying these forces informs the development of strategies for learning to apply cervical mobilisation effectively and safely. This study describes the mechanical properties of cervical PA mobilisation techniques applied by students, and investigates factors associated with force application.Participants: Physiotherapy students (n=120) mobilised one of 32 asymptomatic subjects.Methods: Students applied Grades I to IV central and unilateral PA mobilisation to C2 and C7 of one asymptomatic subject. Manual forces were measured in three directions using an instrumented treatment table. Spinal stiffness of mobilised subjects was measured at C2 and C7 using a device that applied a standard oscillating force while measuring this force and its concurrent displacement. Analysis of variance was used to determine differences between techniques and grades, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to calculate the inter- and intrastudent repeatability of forces, and linear regression was used to determine the associations between applied forces and characteristics of students and mobilised subjects.Results: Mobilisation forces increased from Grades I to IV (highest mean peak force, Grade IV C7 central PA technique: 63.7N). Interstudent reliability was poor [ICC(2,1)=0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.43], but intrastudent repeatability of forces was somewhat better (0.83, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.86). Higher applied force was associated with greater C7 stiffness, increased frequency of thumb pain, male gender of the student or mobilised subject, and a student being earlier in their learning process. Lower forces were associated with greater C2 stiffness.Conclusion: This study describes the cervical mobilisation forces applied by students, and the characteristics of the student and mobilised subject associated with these forces. These results form a basis for the development of strategies to provide objective feedback to students learning to apply cervical mobilisation.</description><dc:title>Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Suzanne J. Snodgrass, Darren A. Rivett, Val J. Robertson, Elizabeth Stojanovski</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.08.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-23</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001102/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The effectiveness of corticosteroid injections compared with physiotherapeutic interventions for adhesive capsulitis: A systematic review - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001102/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections compared with physiotherapeutic interventions for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis/frozen shoulder.Data sources: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED were searched up to Week 23 2009. Additional database searching included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), the National Research Register and the National Recognition Information Centre, also up to Week 23 2009.Review methods: All English-language studies were eligible for inclusion if they showed evidence of random allocation of subjects to either a corticosteroid injection group or a physiotherapeutic intervention group. Studies were considered for inclusion if participants had a stated diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis/frozen shoulder or restriction of passive or active movement in two or more planes. The primary outcomes of interest were pain, external rotation and shoulder disability/function. Quality assessment was assessed using the PEDro scale. Standardised mean differences and effect estimates were calculated for the outcomes of pain, external rotation and shoulder disability at various follow-up periods.Results: Six studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the final review. All had evidence of random allocation to either an injection group or a physiotherapeutic intervention group. There were some differences between the studies with regard to both the corticosteroid injections and physiotherapeutic interventions. Standardised mean differences and effect estimates were calculated for three of the included studies at various follow-up periods. There was a medium effect for corticosteroid injections compared with physiotherapeutic interventions for the outcomes of pain, passive external rotation and shoulder disability at 6 weeks. There was only a small effect in favour of corticosteroid injections for pain, passive external rotation and shoulder disability at 12 to 16 weeks and 26 weeks, and pain and shoulder disability at 52 weeks.Conclusion: The results of this review suggest that corticosteroid injections have greater effect in the short term compared with physiotherapeutic interventions. This decreased over time, with only a small effect in favour of injections in the longer term. The results of this review must be interpreted with some caution due to the limited number of studies and differences in the interventions between the studies.</description><dc:title>The effectiveness of corticosteroid injections compared with physiotherapeutic interventions for adhesive capsulitis: A systematic review - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Victoria Blanchard, Steven Barr, Frances L. Cerisola</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-11-16</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>SYSTEMATIC REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000935/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000935/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The principal aim of this book is to provide a handy pocket guide to exercise, that physiotherapists can carry with them as a reference source during clinical practice.   The title of the book includes the logical progression of events of assessment, prescription and training. The book does cover these areas, but does not present the processes in a logical order as the title suggests; neither within any given chapter nor within the order of chapters.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>John Buckley</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.08.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-11-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001217/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion in strengthening the transverse abdominal muscle in healthy young adults: A preliminary, randomised, controlled study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609001217/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objectives: To compare the effect of the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre with the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion on changes in muscle thickness and associated muscle activity in abdominal muscles.Design: A preliminary, randomised, controlled study.Setting: University laboratory.Participants: Forty healthy adults (18 males, 22 females) were allocated at random to the experimental group [mean age (SD) 24 (1.6) years, n=20] or the control group [mean age (SD) 24 (1.9) years, n=20]. The experimental group performed the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion, and the control group performed the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre alone, five times a day.Main outcome measures: Ultrasonography and electromyography were used to determine the intervention-related changes in muscle activity and the thickness of abdominal muscles during the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre or the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion.Results: A significant difference was found in the thickness of the transverse abdominal muscle between the groups [mean difference 0.24cm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.40, P=0.005. On electromyography, a significant difference was demonstrated in the amplitude of the transverse abdominal muscle contraction between the two techniques in the experimental group (mean difference 68.76mV, 95% CI 53.16 to 84.36, P=0.000. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) showed excellent test–retest reliability of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal muscles: 0.96 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.99) for the transverse abdominal muscle, 0.87 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.98) for the internal oblique muscle and 0.77 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.96) for the external oblique muscle.Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate the additive effect of ankle dorsiflexion on deep core muscle thickness and activity, thus contributing to existing knowledge about therapeutic exercise for the effective management of low back pain.</description><dc:title>Effect of the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion in strengthening the transverse abdominal muscle in healthy young adults: A preliminary, randomised, controlled study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Seung-Chul Chon, Ki-Yeon Chang, Joshua (Sung) H. You</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-11-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900087X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS003194060900087X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This book provides a practical and comprehensive set of clinical tests covering all major regions of the musculoskeletal system. Each chapter proceeds with a clear algorithm depicting symptoms, tests and diagnosis, accompanied with range-of-motion illustrations and an overview of each joint. A step-by-step procedure for each clinical test is provided, together with brief discussion of the assessment evaluation and likely diagnosis.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Martin Thomas</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.07.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000224/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000224/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The third edition of this valuable guideline aims to improve the quality of care delivered to people who have had strokes in the UK by providing ‘comprehensive and coherent guidelines on stroke care’ to clinical staff, those who purchase stroke services, managers, patients and their carers. For the most part, this aim is achieved. The book is organised into detailed sections devoted to different aspects of stroke care, including stroke management systems, rehabilitation and acute stroke care. It also contains a handy, concise, look-up guide for physiotherapists. The first section should be read (pp. 1–13) to allow the reader to understand the derivation of the guidelines and the approach to deciding on recommendations.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Paulette van Vliet</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.01.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-03-16</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000030/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000030/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This book aims to create a comprehensive, single-volume atlas of anatomy using detailed illustrations, diagrams and radiographs. It is arranged in a regional format (i.e. back, thorax, abdomen and pelvis etc.) based on current dissecting approaches. Each region is represented with very detailed, beautifully produced illustrations, supplemented with schematic diagrams in key areas and simplified summary tables. Each component is examined systemically, followed by topographical images to tie in the systems within regions together.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Lindsay M. Bearne</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2008.12.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-02-24</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-02-24</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000042/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.physiotherapyjournal.com/article/PIIS0031940609000042/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This is a well-written, easy-to-follow book with a clear layout. It provides an update on current research understanding of acute and chronic whiplash-associated disorders, cervicogenic headache and neck pain, including cervicobrachial pain. The authors provide a useful critique and analysis of a large body of relevant research, and background literature. The implications for current practice and directions for future clinical research are discussed.</description><dc:title>Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Dean Phillips</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.physio.2009.01.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Physiotherapy (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-02-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Physiotherapy</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-02-23</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>