Physiotherapy
Volume 98, Issue 2 , Pages 143-150, June 2012

Interferential laser therapy in the treatment of shoulder pain and disability from musculoskeletal pathologies: a randomised comparative study

  • Ramón Montes-Molina

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physiotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Ctra. de Colmenar, 28034 Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +34 91 3368692; fax: +34 91 3368881.
  • ,
  • Almudena Prieto-Baquero

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physiotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Ctra. de Colmenar, 28034 Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria E. Martínez-Rodríguez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Ana B. Romojaro-Rodríguez

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physiotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Ctra. de Colmenar, 28034 Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Vanesa Gallego-Méndez

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physiotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Ctra. de Colmenar, 28034 Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Fidel Martínez-Ruiz

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

published online 30 May 2011.

Abstract 

Background

Interference is an important feature of the waves. When two or more in phase light waves meet, a new and reinforced wave is generated. Shoulder pain is a common clinical problem and laser is one of the treatments frequently used to relieve it.

Objective

To test the safety of interferential laser therapy generated by two independent low level lasers and compare its effectiveness with conventional single laser therapy in the reduction of shoulder musculoskeletal pain and associated disability.

Design

Randomised and single-blind controlled clinical trial.

Setting

Physiotherapy Unit and Rehabilitation Department of Ramon y Cajal University Hospital (Madrid).

Participants

200 patients with shoulder musculoskeletal pain were randomly assigned in two groups, 100 people each.

Interventions

Group I, experimental (n=100) received interferential laser, placing two probes opposite each other over the shoulder joint. Group II, control (n=100) received conventional laser therapy, using a single probe along with a second inactive dummy probe. Lasers used were GaAlAs diode (810 nm, 100 mW), in continuous emission. Laser was applied in contact mode through ten sessions, on 5 shoulder points (7 Joules/point) per session.

Main Outcome Measures

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Shoulder Pain Disability index (SPADI), recorded before and after laser treatment.

Results

There were no differences between both groups in the reduction of pain, either assessed by VAS scale (median difference=0, 95% CI of the difference =-.6 to .5, p=0.81) or SPADI index (median difference = .4, 95% CI of the difference =-2.9 to 3.8, p=0.80), using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Comparison between the scores recorded before and after the treatment, within each group, showed significant differences for VAS during movement (median difference=3, 95% CI of the difference =2.07 to 4, p<0.001) and SPADI index (median difference=3.5, 95% CI of the difference =2.67 to 3.85, Wilcoxon test, p<0.001), for both groups.

Conclusions

In this study, the application of two low level lasers in order to generate interference inside the irradiated tissue showed to be a safe therapy. Both interferential and conventional laser therapy reduced shoulder pain and disability. Nevertheless, differences between them were not detected. Future research in this field could include applying this technique with other laser parameters or application forms.

Keywords: Interferential laser therapy, Low-level laser therapy, Shoulder pain, Shoulder disability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00694538.

PII: S0031-9406(11)00067-8

doi:10.1016/j.physio.2011.02.007

Physiotherapy
Volume 98, Issue 2 , Pages 143-150, June 2012