Effect of chest wall vibration timing on peak expiratory flow and inspiratory pressure in a mechanically ventilated lung model
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the effects of chest wall vibration timing on air flow and pressure in a ventilated lung model.
Design
Laboratory-based bench study.
Participants
Thirty physiotherapists with experience in intensive care.
Intervention
Physiotherapists applied three sets of eight chest wall vibrations to an intubated, mechanically ventilated mannequin. Vibrations were applied at the start of expiration (optimal), mid to late inspiration (early) and early to mid expiration (late). Air flow, peak pressure and volume were measured continuously. Forces applied during vibrations were recorded using a force-sensing mat, placed under the physiotherapists’ hands.
Results
During optimal and early vibrations, peak expiratory flow increased significantly compared with baseline ventilation [mean difference for optimal vibrations 8.8
l/minute, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.0 to 11.6; mean difference for early vibrations 7.0
l/minute, 95% CI 4.3 to 9.9]. Late vibrations did not enhance expiratory flow. Peak inspiratory pressure was significantly higher during early vibrations compared with baseline values (mean difference 5.6
cmH2O, 95% CI 2.9 to 8.2). Peak inspiratory pressure generated during early vibrations was, on average, 8.4
cmH2O greater than with optimal timing.
Conclusion
The safety and effectiveness of respiratory physiotherapy treatments are likely to be influenced by the timing of vibrations within the breath cycle. Early vibrations generate potentially dangerous peak inspiratory pressures. Late vibrations, although not harmful, are not effective at increasing peak expiratory flow. This is an important consideration when training physiotherapists and evaluating outcomes of treatments in intensive care.
Keywords: Physiotherapy (techniques), Respiration, Artificial and critical care, Vibration
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0031-9406(10)00035-0
doi:10.1016/j.physio.2010.02.007
© 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
