Physiotherapy
Volume 96, Issue 4 , Pages 344-349, December 2010

Effect of chest wall vibration timing on peak expiratory flow and inspiratory pressure in a mechanically ventilated lung model

  • H. Shannon

      Affiliations

    • Portex Unit: Respiratory Physiology and Physiotherapy, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
    • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Portex Unit: Respiratory Physiology and Physiotherapy, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK. Tel.: +44 0 207 242 9789x2689; fax: +44 0 207 829 8634.
  • ,
  • R. Stiger

      Affiliations

    • Portex Unit: Respiratory Physiology and Physiotherapy, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
    • University Hospitals of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent, UK
  • ,
  • R.K. Gregson

      Affiliations

    • Portex Unit: Respiratory Physiology and Physiotherapy, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
    • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
    • University of Southampton with Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
  • ,
  • J. Stocks

      Affiliations

    • Portex Unit: Respiratory Physiology and Physiotherapy, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  • ,
  • E. Main

      Affiliations

    • Portex Unit: Respiratory Physiology and Physiotherapy, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK

published online 22 April 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

To investigate the effects of chest wall vibration timing on air flow and pressure in a ventilated lung model.

Design

Laboratory-based bench study.

Participants

Thirty physiotherapists with experience in intensive care.

Intervention

Physiotherapists applied three sets of eight chest wall vibrations to an intubated, mechanically ventilated mannequin. Vibrations were applied at the start of expiration (optimal), mid to late inspiration (early) and early to mid expiration (late). Air flow, peak pressure and volume were measured continuously. Forces applied during vibrations were recorded using a force-sensing mat, placed under the physiotherapists’ hands.

Results

During optimal and early vibrations, peak expiratory flow increased significantly compared with baseline ventilation [mean difference for optimal vibrations 8.8l/minute, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.0 to 11.6; mean difference for early vibrations 7.0l/minute, 95% CI 4.3 to 9.9]. Late vibrations did not enhance expiratory flow. Peak inspiratory pressure was significantly higher during early vibrations compared with baseline values (mean difference 5.6cmH2O, 95% CI 2.9 to 8.2). Peak inspiratory pressure generated during early vibrations was, on average, 8.4cmH2O greater than with optimal timing.

Conclusion

The safety and effectiveness of respiratory physiotherapy treatments are likely to be influenced by the timing of vibrations within the breath cycle. Early vibrations generate potentially dangerous peak inspiratory pressures. Late vibrations, although not harmful, are not effective at increasing peak expiratory flow. This is an important consideration when training physiotherapists and evaluating outcomes of treatments in intensive care.

Keywords: Physiotherapy (techniques), Respiration, Artificial and critical care, Vibration

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0031-9406(10)00035-0

doi:10.1016/j.physio.2010.02.007

Physiotherapy
Volume 96, Issue 4 , Pages 344-349, December 2010