Physiotherapy
Volume 95, Issue 3 , Pages 185-191, September 2009

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia: A preliminary efficacy and mechanisms-based investigation

School of Health and Social Care, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK

published online 16 July 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

To determine the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia (TSE) on mechanical pain threshold (MPT) and vibration threshold (VT).

Design

A prospective, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting

Laboratory based.

Participants

Thirty-four healthy volunteers (12 men and 22 women; mean age±standard deviation 30±8 years). Exclusion criteria were conditions affecting upper limb sensation and contraindications to electrical stimulation.

Interventions

Participants were allocated at random to receive TENS (n=8), TSE (n=8), placebo (n=9) or control (n=9). Electrical stimulation was applied for 30minutes (from time 18minutes to 48minutes) via electrodes (5cm×5cm) placed centrally above and below the space between the C6 and C7 spinous processes, with 5cm between electrodes.

Main outcome measures

MPT (using an algometer) and VT (using a vibrameter) were recorded on seven occasions from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand – at baseline (0minutes) and then at 10-minute intervals until the end of the 60-minute testing period.

Results

There were no statistically significant group differences in MPT (all p>0.05). Significant group differences in VT were found at 20, 30 and 40minutes (all p<0.05). Post-hoc tests showed that the TENS group had significantly greater VT than both the placebo [median difference 0.30μm, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.05 to 0.66] and control (0.51μm, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.97) groups at 20minutes, and significantly greater VT than the control group (0.69μm, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.17) at 30minutes (all p<0.008).

Conclusions

Electrical stimulation did not alter MPT. The increase in VT during TENS may be due to distraction or antidromic block of large-diameter nerve fibres. TSE failed to alter either outcome measure significantly.

Keywords: TENS, TSE, Mechanical pain threshold, Vibration threshold, Healthy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0031-9406(09)00057-1

doi:10.1016/j.physio.2009.04.008

Physiotherapy
Volume 95, Issue 3 , Pages 185-191, September 2009