Physiotherapy
Volume 95, Issue 1 , Pages 8-14, March 2009

Reliability of a test measuring transversus abdominis muscle recruitment with a pressure biofeedback unit

  • Katharina von Garnier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Kirstin Köveker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Berid Rackwitz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Ulrike Kober

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Sabine Wilke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Thomas Ewert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Gerold Stucki

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
    • ICF Research Branch of the WHO Collaborating Center for the Family of International Classifications at the German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI), Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
    • Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Tel.: +49 89 7095 4050; fax: +49 89 7095 8836.

published online 23 January 2009.

Abstract 

Background

There are indications that segmental stabilising exercises (SSEs) are effective in the treatment of low back pain. The evaluation of successful training in SSE performance in patients requires a reliable outcome measure. The PRONE test gives an indication of the activity of the transversus abdominis muscle. Performed in prone lying using a pressure biofeedback unit, it has been used as an aid to training and to assess the subject's ability to perform SSEs correctly.

Objectives

To evaluate inter-observer and test–retest reliability of the PRONE test.

Design

Repeated measures by three observers on 2 days.

Setting

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.

Participants

Forty nurses (39 females and one male), aged between 24 and 62 years, with at least one episode of low back pain.

Main outcome measures

During the test, movement of the abdominal wall was monitored by measuring a change in pressure during muscle contraction termed ‘abdominal hollowing’. Defined observation and palpation criteria were verified by the observers to ensure correct execution of the test.

Methods

Participants were tested on two separate days. On the first day, Observer A performed two similar test sets, each with four exercises. On the second test day, Observers B and C conducted one test set each.

Results

This study found an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.67] for inter-observer reliability, and an ICC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.90) for test–retest reliability. Kappa values and the limits of agreement were also calculated with similar results.

Conclusions

For this subject group, the PRONE test had relatively low inter-observer reliability but, as may be expected, higher test–retest reliability. It is suggested that by providing visual feedback, the PRONE test may enhance patients’ insight into their deep abdominal muscle recruitment and thereby increase their motivation to exercise.

Keywords: Low back pain, Pressure biofeedback, Transversus abdominis, Reliability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0031-9406(08)00139-9

doi:10.1016/j.physio.2008.10.003

Physiotherapy
Volume 95, Issue 1 , Pages 8-14, March 2009